Texas Check Collection

    When a check is returned "NSF" or "account closed", the Texas Penal Code and the local District Attorney may help the payee in collecting the check.

    IF the check was given to the payee in order to obtain goods or services, then there might be a prosecution brought against the check writer for the charge of "theft by check".

    Now, if the check was returned "account closed", then the following ten day notice letter isn't legally required, however, it may get the payee paid faster than a criminal charge would.

***************** 

Form for notice letter:

 

 

Mr. [Check Writer's Name]
[Checkwriter's Address]
[City], TX [Zip]

RE: Returned "NSF" Check
 
Dear Mr.[Check Writer's Name] :
 
The check(s) which you presented me for the [item(s) or service] which you purchased on [check date], drawn on the [Bank Name] Bank in the amount of $[check amount], has been returned by your bank marked, "NSF".
 
This is a demand for payment in full for a check or order not paid because of lack of funds or insufficient funds. If you fail to make payment in full within 10 days after the date of receipt of this notice, the failure to pay creates a presumption for committing an offense, and this matter may be referred for criminal prosecution.
 
Therefore, you have 10 business days from receipt of this letter to present payment in the form of cash, money order or certified check for this check or the matter will be referred to the [county where check received] County Criminal District Attorney's Office.
 
Sincerely,

 

[Payee or Payee’s agent]

*************** 
Send this letter by certified mail, Return Receipt Request, and keep copy for your records, along with the receipt.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The statute: 

§ 31.06. PRESUMPTION FOR THEFT BY CHECK.  (a) If the actor 
obtained property or secured performance of service by issuing or 
passing a check or similar sight order for the payment of money, 
when the issuer did not have sufficient funds in or on deposit with 
the bank or other drawee for the payment in full of the check or 
order as well as all other checks or orders then outstanding, it is 
prima facie evidence of his intent to deprive the owner of property 
under Section 31.03 (Theft) including a drawee or third-party 
holder in due course who negotiated the check or to avoid payment 
for service under Section 31.04 (Theft of Service) (except in the 
case of a postdated check or order) if:
		(1)  he had no account with the bank or other drawee at 
the time he issued the check or order;  or
		(2)  payment was refused by the bank or other drawee for 
lack of funds or insufficient funds, on presentation within 30 days 
after issue, and the issuer failed to pay the holder in full within 
10 days after receiving notice of that refusal.
	(b)  For purposes of Subsection (a)(2) or (f)(3), notice may 
be actual notice or notice in writing that:
		(1)  is sent by registered or certified mail with 
return receipt requested or by telegram with report of delivery 
requested;
		(2)  is addressed to the issuer at his address shown on:                      
			(A)  the check or order;                                                     
			(B)  the records of the bank or other drawee;  or                            
			(C)  the records of the person to whom the check or 
order has been issued or passed;  and
		(3)  contains the following statement:                                        
			"This is a demand for payment in full for a check 
or order not paid because of a lack of funds or insufficient funds.  
If you fail to make payment in full within 10 days after the date of 
receipt of this notice, the failure to pay creates a presumption for 
committing an offense, and this matter may be referred for criminal 
prosecution."
	(c)  If written notice is given in accordance with Subsection 
(b), it is presumed that the notice was received no later than five 
days after it was sent.
	(d)  Nothing in this section prevents the prosecution from 
establishing the requisite intent by direct evidence.
	(e)  Partial restitution does not preclude the presumption 
of the requisite intent under this section.
	(f)  If the actor obtained property by issuing or passing a 
check or similar sight order for the payment of money, the actor's 
intent to deprive the owner of the property under Section 31.03 
(Theft) is presumed, except in the case of a postdated check or 
order, if:
		(1)  the actor ordered the bank or other drawee to stop 
payment on the check or order;
		(2)  the bank or drawee refused payment to the holder on 
presentation of the check or order within 30 days after issue;
		(3)  the owner gave the actor notice of the refusal of 
payment and made a demand to the actor for payment or return of the 
property;  and
		(4)  the actor failed to:                                                     
			(A)  pay the holder within 10 days after receiving 
the demand for payment;  or
			(B)  return the property to the owner within 10 
days after receiving the demand for return of the property.

Untitled